This is the first episode of the Autoimmune Theory & Practice podcast series. I am recording a series of interviews and conversations related to the themes of this project: health, illness, and ecology.
This interview contains many technical Ayurvedic terms in Sanskrit. You can find a detailed glossary below, explaining their usage in context.
Introduction
The Ayurvedic concept of “ojas” is not the immune system. It is an emergent functional coherence that arises when digestion, tissue nutrition, doshic balance, and mental stability are all operating optimally. When you reduce ojas to “immunity,” you lose stamina, you lose aging, you lose the capacity of the mind to support the body and be supported by it. Vaidya Dr. P. Rammanohar has spent decades at the interface of classical Ayurvedic scholarship and contemporary biomedical research, and he came to this conversation with a refusal: Ayurveda should not be validated by measuring whether its medicines activate T cells. That is a ripple, not the current.
This episode follows the argument through four movements. First, the four domains of ojas and why they cannot be captured by immunology. Second, the NIH-funded randomized controlled trial that preserved Ayurvedic clinical reasoning inside a Western study design, and what happened when it did. Third, the Ayurvedic description of autoimmunity as a body that is angry, not a body that is attacking itself, and the distinction between ama as metabolic stress and ama as toxin. Fourth, Janapadodhwamsa, Charaka’s model of planetary health, and the claim that ecological disruption and immune dysregulation are not analogous but the same process at different scales.
Dr. Rammanohar is the Research Director at ĀCĀRA (Amrita Centre for Advanced Research in Ayurveda), Amritapuri. He served as Ayurvedic physician-investigator on the NIH-funded randomized controlled trial of individualized Ayurvedic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study to preserve classical Ayurvedic clinical reasoning inside a Western trial design. His editorial “Research for Understanding as Opposed to Evaluating Ayurveda” shaped the episode’s central question.
Timestamps
00:00 Intro
00:36 Ojas Beyond Immunity
02:15 Meet Dr Rammanohar
03:19 Host Autoimmunity Journey
05:40 Translation Loss Question
05:57 Defining Ojas Properly
10:02 Four Domains of Ojas
18:14 NIH Trial Ayurveda Logic
24:42 Amavata Versus Rheumatoid Arthritic
28:46 Dual Diagnosis Research
31:54 Autoimmunity Beyond Agni
35:26 Ama Not Toxins
37:27 Ayurvedic Immune Homeostasis
39:55 Planetary Ecology Immune Rise
43:19 Ayurveda and Planetary Health
46:20 Dharma as Repair Path
49:58 Science Meets Ancient Wisdom
References mentioned:
Rammanohar, P. “Research for Understanding as Opposed to Evaluating Ayurveda.” Ancient Science of Life 34, no. 2 (2014): 61–63. DOI: 10.4103/0257-7941.153456
Furst, D.E., Venkatraman, M.M., Ram Manohar, P., et al. “Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study Comparing Classic Ayurvedic Medicine, Methotrexate, and Their Combination in Rheumatoid Arthritis.” Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 17, no. 4 (2011): 185–192. PubMed: 21617554
Furst, D.E., Venkatraman, M.M., Ram Manohar, P., et al. “Well Controlled, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Classical Ayurvedic Treatment Are Possible in Rheumatoid Arthritis.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 70, no. 2 (2011): 392. ard.bmj.com
Caraka Samhita, Janapadodhwamsa passage (Vimāna Sthāna 3)
Caraka Samhita, Vatarakta passage: “Kṛpābhyāsa iva krodham vātaraktam niyacchati”
Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing): Mi’kmaq principle of layered knowing, originating from Elders Albert and Murdena Marshall and Dr. Cheryl Bartlett at Cape Breton University. Referenced in WHO-affiliated integrative health frameworks. Wikipedia; Tremblay & Martin, “Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing,” in Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research, Vol. 3 (Springer, 2023).
Texts by Rammanohar:
“The Translational Framework of Ayurveda as a Knowledge System”, Ancient Science of Life 35(4), 2016
“Backing Up Ayurveda with Good Science: The Modus Operandi”, Ancient Science of Life 34(3), 2015
Sanskrit Glossary
Terms appear in the order they arise in the conversation.
Ojas — The net functional coherence that emerges when digestion, tissue nutrition, doshic balance, and mental stability are all operating optimally. Not a substance. Not the immune system. Rammanohar identifies four domains: resistance to disease (Vyādhi Kṣamatvam), stamina and endurance, slow biological aging, and mental stability. The analogy is gravity: you cannot see it, but when an object falls, you know it is functioning. Ojas is what the body has when all its systems are working in concert, and what it loses when they are not.
Balam — Innate strength or capacity. Sometimes used as a functional synonym for ojas, but balam refers more specifically to the observable power of the body to act, endure, and recover. Where ojas is the principle, balam is what you measure.
Vyādhi Kṣamatvam — The body’s capacity to tolerate disease. Not immunity in the Western sense of pathogen-specific defense, but the ability to remain functional when disease is present. One of the four domains of ojas identified by Rammanohar.
Vyādhyutpādapratibandhakatvam — The body’s capacity to resist the onset of disease. Distinct from tolerance (kṣamatvam). Where tolerance describes how well you cope with what has already arrived, this describes how well you prevent what has not yet arrived. Together, tolerance and resistance form two of the four domains of ojas.
Agni — The principle of transformation. Not an enzyme, not an acid, not stomach fire. Agni is what enables the body to distinguish self from non-self, to digest food into nutrient pools, and to separate what can be assimilated from what must be expelled. When agni is weak, ama accumulates. When agni functions well, ojas has the material conditions to arise. The analogy Rammanohar offers: agni is like gravity, a principle you observe through its effects rather than a component you can isolate.
Ama — That which has not been properly transformed. Neither waste nor essence. The word comes from the Sanskrit root meaning “to move” with the negative prefix: that which is not moving, not being digested, not completing its transformation. When ama persists in the body, it creates confusion: the tissue recognizes it as partially self and partially foreign, and inflammatory pathways activate. Ama is not a toxin. When ama becomes toxic, it is called amaviṣa. The common mistranslation “ama = toxins” erases the distinction between undigested metabolic residue and actual poison (viṣa), and with it, the Ayurvedic logic of how autoimmune conditions develop.
Amaviṣa — Ama that has become toxic. If ama were already a toxin, there would be no need for a separate term. The distinction matters: ama is metabolic stress that can still be cleared; amaviṣa has fermented into something that actively damages tissue.
Satmya and Asatmya — That which becomes part of you (satmya) and that which cannot become part of you (asatmya). The root of satmya carries the sense of dwelling with, cohabiting. Asatmya is what the body cannot assimilate. This is the Ayurvedic framework for allergies, intolerances, and autoimmune processes: not the body attacking itself, but the body unable to metabolize something that has entered it, and responding with inflammation.
Yukti — The physician’s clinical reasoning. In the context of the NIH study, yukti means the practitioner’s judgment about which medicine to prescribe for which patient at which stage of disease. It is the opposite of a fixed protocol. Rammanohar’s study preserved yukti by allowing individualized prescriptions within a pre-approved list of 150 medicines, rather than forcing a single drug for all patients.
Samprāpti — The full pathogenesis of a disease, from initial doshic accumulation through provocation, spread, localization, manifestation, and complication. Ayurveda does not describe diseases as fixed entities but as pathways. Amavata is a samprāpti, not a diagnosis in the Western sense. Vatarakta is a different samprāpti. A patient with what Western medicine calls rheumatoid arthritis may present with elements of both, and the Ayurvedic treatment follows the samprāpti, not the Western label.
Amavata — A disease pathway (samprāpti) in which ama combines with vata dosha. Classically described as affecting the axial skeleton: cervical and lumbar regions (trika sandhi), with stiffness and immobility of the spine. More closely resembles ankylosing spondylitis than rheumatoid arthritis, which affects the peripheral and symmetrical joints. Rammanohar’s clinical experience is that rheumatoid arthritis often presents with both amavata and vatarakta samprāptis overlapping in the same patient.
Vatarakta — A disease pathway in which vitiated vata combines with rakta (blood) dhatu. Classically described as beginning in the smaller joints of the hands and feet, symmetrically, and spreading from there. This matches the clinical progression of rheumatoid arthritis more closely than amavata does. The Caraka Samhita describes vatarakta as requiring the physician to treat the body “like an angry person” (Kṛpābhyāsa iva krodham vātaraktam niyacchati), with forbearance and persistent gentle treatment rather than aggressive intervention.
Rakta duṣṭi — Derangement or vitiation of the blood tissue (rakta dhatu). When ama in the body generates heat during treatment, that heat can disturb rakta, producing a secondary pathology that requires vatarakta treatment principles even when the primary condition is amavata.
Trika sandhi — The junctions where three bones meet. In the Ayurvedic anatomical context, trika refers specifically to the cervical (neck) and lumbar (lower back) regions. Amavata’s preference for the axial skeleton is described in terms of trika sandhi becoming stiff and immobile.
Dhātu — Not “tissue” in the Western sense, though often translated that way. Dhātu means support: the dynamic nutrient pools that sustain the body’s structures through continuous metabolic transformation. The seven dhātus (rasa, rakta, māmsa, meda, asthi, majjā, śukra) are stages of progressive refinement. Ojas is described as the essence of all seven dhātus. The Western translation “seven tissues” loses the metabolic, transformative dimension entirely.
Srotas (plural: srotāṁsi) — Channels of the body through which nutrients, waste, energy, and information flow. Not just blood vessels or nerves. Srotas includes functional pathways: the digestive channel, the respiratory channel, the channels of tissue nutrition. When srotas are clear, the body functions well. When they are obstructed (sanga), stagnant (atipravṛtti), or diverted (vimārga gamanam), disease processes begin. In the Ayurvedic approach to autoimmunity, clearing the srotas is one of the primary interventions.
Śodhana and Śamana — Two categories of Ayurvedic treatment. Śodhana is purification: removing ama and excess doshas through the five purificatory procedures of pañcakarma (emesis, purgation, medicated enemas, nasal administration, bloodletting). Śamana is pacification: calming the doshas without eliminating them, using diet, herbs, and lifestyle adjustments. In the NIH study, only śamana therapies were tested. Śodhana was excluded from the trial design as a first-step simplification.
Sadvṛttam — Right conduct, ethical lifestyle. The Ayurvedic framework for how daily and seasonal habits, interpersonal ethics, and environmental awareness contribute to health. When Rammanohar says that health is not just about what nutrients go into us but whether we are disturbing the ecosystem, he is invoking sadvṛttam.
Hitāhāra — Wholesome food. But not in the modern nutritional sense. Hitāhāra is food that is wholesome in the creating: that does not disturb the ecosystem in its production, harvesting, cooking, and distribution. The opposite is food that is nutritionally dense but ecologically destructive. Rammanohar makes this distinction explicit: what we call “good food” today means protein content. What Ayurveda calls hitāhāra means food whose entire chain of production is dharmic.
Dharma Hiṁsā and Kāma Hiṁsā — Dharma hiṁsā: violence within the limits of the food chain, the ecological order. An animal killed for nutrition within the natural food web, at a scale that does not disturb ecological balance. Kāma hiṁsā: violence for pleasure, for entertainment, for appetite that exceeds need. The industrial meat system is kāma hiṁsā. Ayurveda does not prohibit all animal protein; it distinguishes between sustenance that fits within the ecological order and consumption that breaks it.
Janapadodhvaṁsa — The destruction of communities. A passage in the Caraka Samhita (Vimāna Sthana 3) that describes a sequence of ecological collapse: first the land is damaged (deśa), then the water (jala), then the air, then the climate (kāla), and finally the society itself collapses. Rammanohar calls this the earliest model of planetary health. When the environment degrades, the body’s exposure changes, its food loses prāṇa, and the immune system, stretched beyond its capacity to adapt, begins to dysregulate. The current global rise in autoimmune conditions is, in this framework, not a collection of individual diseases but a single process at the scale of the population.
Prāṇa — Not just oxygen. The vital force that animates breath, food, and water. When Rammanohar says that even pure water may lack prāṇic energy if it has been stripped of its connection to its source, he is invoking a dimension of vitality that cannot be measured by chemical analysis. Air that is polluted does not merely lack oxygen; it lacks prāṇa. This is not a metaphor. In the Ayurvedic framework, prāṇa is a functional reality with direct consequences for the body’s capacity to maintain ojas.à
Theme music: « Tremblement » by Michaël Boudreau, from the album Terre.
To listen to the track, here:
Michaël’s link tree: https://linktr.ee/michaelboudreau
